Skip to main content

Does Stock Options' Put-Call Parity Make Sense?

Put-call parity formula is for European options, which can be only exercised at expiration.

Put-cal parity is based on the no-arbitrage pricing theory, which says whenever there is an arbitrage opportunity, there will be enough of that arbitrage trading to make the underlying assets' prices move to where there is no arbitrage opportunity.

No-arbitrage pricing theory says two equal things must have the same values. Otherwise, one can sell the expensive and buy the cheap to make a risk-free profit.

Formula

Options can be priced based on the put-call parity formula which is the following:

C + PV(x) = P + S

Where C is the price of call, PV(x) is the present value of strike price, P is the price of put, and S is the spot price of

For example, XYZ stock spot price is $100, 1-year risk-free rate is 1%, for 1-year call and put options with the same strike price of 101, the following formula holds.

C + PV(101) = P + S

C - P = 100 - 101/(1 + 0.01) = 0 

Derivation of the Put-Call Parity Formula

Two equal things have equal price. We need to see C + PV(x) equal P + S to prove C + PV(x) = P + S.

Using the previous example, we can see that at the options' expiration date, their values are always the same regardless.

XYZ Spot Price at expiration C + PV(x) P + S
960 + 1015 + 96
97 0 + 101 4 + 97
98 0 + 101 3 + 98
99 0 + 101 2 + 99
100 0 + 101 1 + 100
101 0 + 101 0 + 101
1021 +1010 + 102
1032 + 1010 + 103
1043 + 1010 + 104

In Reality

On August 9, 2021, SPY closed at 442.13.

2021/9/10 call for SPY at 442 was $6.71, and the put was 6.35$.

1-month treasury rate is 0.04%. 0.04%/12 is the 1-month risk-free rate, which is 0.000033333.

C + PV(x) = P + S

C + PV(x) = 6.71 + 442/(1 + 0.000033333) = 450.70

P + S = 6.35 + 442.13 = 448.48

450.70 - 448.48 = 2.22

I guess this $2.22 is the extra fee for the right to exercise the option earlier rather than at the expiration date. SPY options are American-style options, which can be exercised prior to expiration dates.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Which is better? BND or AGG?

The US 10-year treasury yield has reached at 2007-2008 years level, which is about 16 years ago. From a technical point of view, it is a buy. Then there are 2 bond ETFs that I am interested in. There are BND and AGG. They are very similar in nature. US 10 year Treasury Bond, chart, prices - FT.com Expense Ratio BND: 0.03% AGG: 0.03% The same. Turnover Rate BND: 40.00% AGG: 104.0% BNG seems better. Historical Performance Comparison Investment duration: 5 years with no tax on dividends BND wins a little with winning rate of 57.5%, but AGG wins 0.012% in return. Investment duration: 5 years with 30% tax on dividends AGG wins a little with winning rate of 65% and a 0.079% difference on average. Investment duration: 10 years with no tax on dividends AGG wins a little with winning rate of 67% and a 0.024% difference on average. Investment duration: 10 years with 30%  tax on dividends AGG wins a little with winning rate of 99% and a 0.095% difference on average. C...