Skip to main content

IWF and VRGWX Performance Comparison

This artical is about comparing performance between IWF and VRGWX. The VRGWX's inception date is 2010/9/23

The "Run 100 Comparisons" button is for running randomly select dates and compare 100 times. The result is how many of the 100 times does IWF beat VRGWX. My conclusion is that VRGWX and IWF yield the similar returns.

Note that the Run 100 Comparison simulator takes about 10 seconds for the computer to run, so please be patient and check the result in the 3rd bullet point.

Start Date:
End Date:
This button is for running 100 comparions with a set of investment span.
  • VRGWX Return: -5.164%
  • IWF Return: -5.279%
May 2021Jul 2021Sep 2021Nov 2021Jan 2022Mar 2022May 202295010001050110011501200
Value of a VRGWX PortfolioValue of an IWF PortfolioVRGWX and IWF Returns Comparison

Simulate Randomly 100 Times

  • In 100 times of comparisons, there are times that IWF has better retruns than VRGWX.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Which is better? BND or AGG?

The US 10-year treasury yield has reached at 2007-2008 years level, which is about 16 years ago. From a technical point of view, it is a buy. Then there are 2 bond ETFs that I am interested in. There are BND and AGG. They are very similar in nature. US 10 year Treasury Bond, chart, prices - FT.com Expense Ratio BND: 0.03% AGG: 0.03% The same. Turnover Rate BND: 40.00% AGG: 104.0% BNG seems better. Historical Performance Comparison Investment duration: 5 years with no tax on dividends BND wins a little with winning rate of 57.5%, but AGG wins 0.012% in return. Investment duration: 5 years with 30% tax on dividends AGG wins a little with winning rate of 65% and a 0.079% difference on average. Investment duration: 10 years with no tax on dividends AGG wins a little with winning rate of 67% and a 0.024% difference on average. Investment duration: 10 years with 30%  tax on dividends AGG wins a little with winning rate of 99% and a 0.095% difference on average. C...