Skip to main content

Is LQD Good?

In the other article, I did a resaerch on Franklin Income fund and found that the fund did pretty well during the 2000 and the 2008 financial crisis. Then I became curious about if any bond ETF can beat Franklin Income fund. I found LQD,iShares iBoxx Inv Grade Corporate Bond ETF.

Does LQD Pay Increasing Dividends?

No, it doesn't.

Sharpe Ratio

  • Data range: 2002/7/30 - 2022/7/1
  • Mean annual return for SPY is 12.461%, better than 5.791% of LQD's.
  • Annual return standard deviation for SPY is 16.901%, worse than 6.462% of LQD's.
  • Mean return divided by standard deviation for SPY is 0.737, worse than 0.896 of LQD's. 
  • Wtih the risk free rate being 2%, SPY's Sharpe ratio is 0.619 which is better than LQD's 0.587.
  • FKINX's mean return is 7.873%, standard deviation is 14.156%, Sharpe ratio is 0.5561 when the rate is 0% and 0.405 when the rate is 2%.

SPY

LQD

Invested At the High Before 2008 Financial Crisis

  • LQD beat SPY about 7 years from the high from 2007/10/9 to May of 2015.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Which is better? BND or AGG?

The US 10-year treasury yield has reached at 2007-2008 years level, which is about 16 years ago. From a technical point of view, it is a buy. Then there are 2 bond ETFs that I am interested in. There are BND and AGG. They are very similar in nature. US 10 year Treasury Bond, chart, prices - FT.com Expense Ratio BND: 0.03% AGG: 0.03% The same. Turnover Rate BND: 40.00% AGG: 104.0% BNG seems better. Historical Performance Comparison Investment duration: 5 years with no tax on dividends BND wins a little with winning rate of 57.5%, but AGG wins 0.012% in return. Investment duration: 5 years with 30% tax on dividends AGG wins a little with winning rate of 65% and a 0.079% difference on average. Investment duration: 10 years with no tax on dividends AGG wins a little with winning rate of 67% and a 0.024% difference on average. Investment duration: 10 years with 30%  tax on dividends AGG wins a little with winning rate of 99% and a 0.095% difference on average. C...