Skip to main content

Performance Comparison Between IWF and IWM

IWF tracks the Russal Growth 1000 Index while IWM track the Russal 2000 index, both of which can be considered growth oriented.

Performance Comparison

Tax Rate on Dividends: %
Start Date:
End Date:
Investment Duration When Randomly Select Dates: days.

Run 100 Times

No. IWM Wins IWF(%) IWM(%) Diff.(%)
Average 0 0 0 0

Return Standard Deviation

Periodically Withdrawing

Withdraw Frequency:
Fund Starting Value:
Withdrawal Rate: %
Tax Rate on Dividends: %
Start Date:

Run 100 Times

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Which is better? BND or AGG?

The US 10-year treasury yield has reached at 2007-2008 years level, which is about 16 years ago. From a technical point of view, it is a buy. Then there are 2 bond ETFs that I am interested in. There are BND and AGG. They are very similar in nature. US 10 year Treasury Bond, chart, prices - FT.com Expense Ratio BND: 0.03% AGG: 0.03% The same. Turnover Rate BND: 40.00% AGG: 104.0% BNG seems better. Historical Performance Comparison Investment duration: 5 years with no tax on dividends BND wins a little with winning rate of 57.5%, but AGG wins 0.012% in return. Investment duration: 5 years with 30% tax on dividends AGG wins a little with winning rate of 65% and a 0.079% difference on average. Investment duration: 10 years with no tax on dividends AGG wins a little with winning rate of 67% and a 0.024% difference on average. Investment duration: 10 years with 30%  tax on dividends AGG wins a little with winning rate of 99% and a 0.095% difference on average. C...